Some Rules of Puritanical Libertarianism (PL)

PL says no to initiated aggression (it is important to distinguish between initiated aggression and aggression that is a response to aggression. The implications are many. A few related to contemporary time and space. Implications? No taxation. This would not remove the need to spend on services such as security or dispute arbitration. It would …

Contemporary Absurdities

Taxation and redistribution of other people’s stuff. Regulation of voluntary choice in contract, what must or must not be spoken, written or otherwise produced. Fiat money and fractional banking. These are absurdities. What supports and protects practical absurdities (speculative/theoretical absurdities cannot be supported)? An analogy in suicide. It is possible practically to choose self-destruction. But …

Redistribution extended

Have you ever considered that security services are redistributed every bit as much as food or health services and in fact have been so for much longer. These services (police, judges) are payed for by some and distributed to all. Why are some coerced into paying for the services that others take? Why do those …